Forums : Posts

Thanks for the feedback -- and your patience. So I think we have something now that is actionable. I decided that the back link language really didn't make much sense. So now it reads. Subject to the ... [More] terms and conditions of this section, Ohloh grants you a royalty-free, fully paid-up, worldwide, non-transferable, non-exclusive, limited license to use, reproduce, modify and publicly display the Ohloh Materials (Materials) on Ohloh’s website in and/or on any of your online publications and/or web pages, provided that you agree to attribute Ohloh as the source of any Materials. [Less]

Thanks for the response, I had done a quick scan but missed this thread. I'll contribute to that thread where I can.

Greetings AC, We haven't adopted a standard project schema (yet). As they say, the problem with standards is that there are so many to choose from! It looks like DOAP and POM have gained/attained ... [More] some momentum, while PAD seems dead-ish (I haven't seen much PAD use). Alternatively, Freshmeat's schema, while not 'standard', would be very convenient . Your request is very reasonable and somewhat related to a feature we'd like to implement soon-ish: single project title namespace. The goal would be to move to more useful urls (think: /projects/gaim rather than project/3242). So, if I understand your request correctly, we'd have to add POM groupId and artifactID fields to our project properties and allow the ability to refer to projects with the url you describe. Finally, we'd have to render the appropriate POM XML files -- right? I'm theoretically inclined to do this, except for one nagging question: for what percentage of projects would POM be relevant? [Less]

Hi Stephen, I've scheduled new counts for both Chilimoon and Caudium. I believe the branch mixing was caused by a bug in Ohloh which we fixed just a few days ago. I haven't investigated this case ... [More] closely but it looks like the some problem. Because the bug is now fixed, the recount should clean up the branching. Again, let me know if anything still looks wrong after the recounts. Thanks, Robin [Less]

Ohloh checks the version control servers (CVS, SVN, etc) for the different projects regularly, and gets information from those servers about who committed what. Ohloh then analyses those changes to ... [More] see how to attribute them. When you have an account on Ohloh, you can then claim your contributions by clicking the This is me button. [Less]

Ohloh used to have a really convenient link in the top right of every page to report a problem or make a suggestion, either privately or to the Suggestions forum. I really appreciated this, and used ... [More] it many times to make well-received suggestions. This link seems to have gone missing. Any chance of putting it back? Thank you. [Less]

I really like the new logo feature. I noticed when attempting to upload a logo that when scaling it to 64x64 Ohloh didn't keep the aspect ratio. Could the scaling please keep the aspect ratio ... [More] , padding on either left and right or top and bottom to keep the logo centered? Thank you. [Less]

Hi, It seems that there may be an issue with the Small development team factoid. My project (http://www.ohloh.net/projects/5036) has had commits by 4 different developers in the last two months, but ... [More] this says that only 3 have contributed in the past 12 months. Thanks. [Less]

KDE is registered complete and some of it parts. Take a look at my profile for example. I claimed both mjansen commiters for KDE and KDElibs because that's both me. But now get 2 commits for each ... [More] KDElibs commit. KDElibs subversion repository is part of KDE subversion repository. I don't think that's right. Mike [Less]

Working in free software sometimes means that people want to send you a shirt. When they do this, they have to ask for your shirt size. It would be useful to store a developer's shirt size among all the other information kept here about them.