Ratings and Reviews
Community Rating
Average Rating: 4.7/5.0Number of Ratings: 31Number of Reviews: 2
My Review of XWiki |
||
| You have not rated or reviewed this project.Click below to rate/review. | My Rating: | |
| New Review | ||
Most Helpful Reviews
XWiki is a very mighty and extensible wiki software. Based on Java/JSPs and container-capable (like Tomcat 6) this wiki was made for Java people!
Just read about all its features on XWiki's web page. I mainly use this wiki as a collaborative / intranet software, that can be easily extended f.ex. by groovy scripting.
All I can say that I get along well with it, and I have used and tested a number of different wikis before. I have tested XWiki maybe one or two years earlier, and by then it was way too slow and clumsy, but now it's fine and fast.
MediaWiki might be more straightforward, but not as flexible. Bitweaver wiki is small and easy to handle, but not very ergonomic to some respect, let alone extendable.
So XWiki seems to be a good choice.
Most Recent Reviews
I tried using XWiki for MediaWiki parsing. I had hard time figting with multitude of unsupported MediaWiki features in XWiki and finally moved away from it completely.
XWiki is a very mighty and extensible wiki software. Based on Java/JSPs and container-capable (like Tomcat 6) this wiki was made for Java people!
Just read about all its features on XWiki's web page. I mainly use this wiki as a collaborative / intranet software, that can be easily extended f.ex. by groovy scripting.
All I can say that I get along well with it, and I have used and tested a number of different wikis before. I have tested XWiki maybe one or two years earlier, and by then it was way too slow and clumsy, but now it's fine and fast.
MediaWiki might be more straightforward, but not as flexible. Bitweaver wiki is small and easy to handle, but not very ergonomic to some respect, let alone extendable.
So XWiki seems to be a good choice.