2
I Use This!
Activity Not Available

Ratings and Reviews

Community Rating
0.0
 

Average Rating:   0.0/5.0
Number of Ratings:   0
Number of Reviews:   1

My Review of OpenDCN

You have not rated or reviewed this project.
Click below to rate/review.
My Rating:
0
 
 New Review

Most Helpful Reviews

sonnante says:
OpenDCN for e-participation and ...  
0.0
 
written over 14 years ago

The openDCN software environment - where DCN stands for Deliberative Community Networks – provides on-line tools for supporting e-participation and e-deliberation.

With openDCN you can create an online environment formed by two main interrelated spaces:
- the community space, aimed at fostering public dialog on civic issues and facilitating the rise of mutual trust between participants through free discussions. From a technical point of view, community space consists of public forums enriched with a direct view on messages attachments and the possibility to add a wiki document that summarize forum debate;

- the deliberation space to foster the creation of a shared vision position among the participants, i.e., to finalize a deliberative process in order to produce a well defined outcome. Deliberation space makes up the core of the participatory system; participatory processes consist of a series of deliberation stages, each relying on a different participatory modality and involving different participants. This therefore calls for outright structured participatory processes, divided into clearly distinct phases, each of which relies on a specific deliberation tool. Despite their differences, all the deliberation tools share three architectural functionalities: identifying the actors, framing the issue, and producing a shared position that summarizes the outcome of the deliberation process. Each module manages these three constituents independently from one another. For example, there are likely to be more actors identified for a voting session than those who speak out on a technical panel. The platform therefore supports redistributing the participants of each module into groups with different roles.

An informational space (aimed at facilitating sharing and collection of information provided by citizens to support group activities) is integrated in both the others two spaces.

Did this review help you? |

Most Recent Reviews

sonnante says:
OpenDCN for e-participation and ...  
0.0
 
written over 14 years ago

The openDCN software environment - where DCN stands for Deliberative Community Networks – provides on-line tools for supporting e-participation and e-deliberation.

With openDCN you can create an online environment formed by two main interrelated spaces:
- the community space, aimed at fostering public dialog on civic issues and facilitating the rise of mutual trust between participants through free discussions. From a technical point of view, community space consists of public forums enriched with a direct view on messages attachments and the possibility to add a wiki document that summarize forum debate;

- the deliberation space to foster the creation of a shared vision position among the participants, i.e., to finalize a deliberative process in order to produce a well defined outcome. Deliberation space makes up the core of the participatory system; participatory processes consist of a series of deliberation stages, each relying on a different participatory modality and involving different participants. This therefore calls for outright structured participatory processes, divided into clearly distinct phases, each of which relies on a specific deliberation tool. Despite their differences, all the deliberation tools share three architectural functionalities: identifying the actors, framing the issue, and producing a shared position that summarizes the outcome of the deliberation process. Each module manages these three constituents independently from one another. For example, there are likely to be more actors identified for a voting session than those who speak out on a technical panel. The platform therefore supports redistributing the participants of each module into groups with different roles.

An informational space (aimed at facilitating sharing and collection of information provided by citizens to support group activities) is integrated in both the others two spaces.

Did this review help you? |