1
I Use This!
Very Low Activity
Analyzed about 13 hours ago. based on code collected about 13 hours ago.

Project Summary

-- We are not a fork of L2J! --

I have started this server because I was unhappy with the documentation and implementation of the server. Memory consumption was too high and the code was badly written and/or confuse.

It was also restricted to a single database (MySQL 5) which was not good.

In this project, I have tried to address all the issues of L2J and tried to still keep it simple. All the core is based in Services, each service providing a small function.

Tags

emulator java l2jserver l2jserver2 lineage lineage2 mmorpg rewrite role-playing rpg server

Badges

In a Nutshell, l2jserver2...

Quick Reference

GNU General Public License v3.0 only
Permitted

Commercial Use

Modify

Distribute

Place Warranty

Use Patent Claims

Forbidden

Sub-License

Hold Liable

Required

Distribute Original

Disclose Source

Include Copyright

State Changes

Include License

Include Install Instructions

These details are provided for information only. No information here is legal advice and should not be used as such.

Project Security

Vulnerabilities per Version ( last 10 releases )

There are no reported vulnerabilities

Project Vulnerability Report

Security Confidence Index

Poor security track-record
Favorable security track-record

Vulnerability Exposure Index

Many reported vulnerabilities
Few reported vulnerabilities

Did You Know...

  • ...
    55% of companies leverage OSS for production infrastructure
  • ...
    you can subscribe to e-mail newsletters to receive update from the Open Hub blog
  • ...
    65% of companies leverage OSS to speed application development in 2016
  • ...
    you can embed statistics from Open Hub on your site
About Project Security

Languages

XML
86%
Java
14%
3 Other
<1%

30 Day Summary

Sep 6 2022 — Oct 6 2022

12 Month Summary

Oct 6 2021 — Oct 6 2022
  • 0 Commits
    Down -1 (100%) from previous 12 months
  • 0 Contributors
    Down -1 (100%) from previous 12 months

Ratings

1 user rates this project:
5.0
 
5.0/5.0
Click to add your rating
  
Review this Project!