The Fancy Programming Language

I Use This!

Inactive

Analyzed about 8 hours ago. based on code collected about 8 hours ago.

Project Summary

Fancy is a dynamic, object-oriented programming language heavily inspired by Smalltalk, Ruby and Erlang. It supports dynamic code evaluation (as in Ruby & Smalltalk), class-based mixins, (simple) pattern matching, runtime introspection & reflection, "monkey patching" and much more. It runs on Rubinius, the Ruby VM, and thus has first-class integration with Ruby's core library and any additional Ruby libraries that run on Rubinius, including most C-extensions.

Badges

In a Nutshell, The Fancy Programming Language...

...
has had 2,829 commits made by 11 contributors
representing 2,845 lines of code
...
is mostly written in Ruby
with a low number of source code comments
...
has a codebase with a long source history
maintained by nobody
with stable Y-O-Y commits
...
took an estimated 1 years of effort (COCOMO model)
starting with its first commit in January, 2010
ending with its most recent commit over 11 years ago

Quick Reference

Project Links:

Homepage
Download

Code Locations:

https://github.com/bakkdoor/fancy

Similar Projects:

Managers:

Christopher Bertels

Licenses

BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License

Permitted

Commercial Use

Modify

Distribute

Place Warranty

Forbidden

Hold Liable

Use Trademarks

Required

Include Copyright

Include License

These details are provided for information only. No information here is legal advice and should not be used as such.

All Licenses

Project Security

Vulnerabilities per Version ( last 10 releases )

There are no reported vulnerabilities

Project Vulnerability Report

Security Confidence Index

Poor security track-record

Favorable security track-record

Vulnerability Exposure Index

Many reported vulnerabilities

Few reported vulnerabilities

About Project Vulnerability Report

Did You Know...

...
55% of companies leverage OSS for production infrastructure
...
you can subscribe to e-mail newsletters to receive update from the Open Hub blog
...
in 2016, 47% of companies did not have formal process in place to track OS code
...
by exploring contributors within projects, you can view details on every commit they have made to that project

About Project Security