DbLinq

Tisztelt Hölgyem/Uram! Konferenciák, üzleti találkozók alkalmából ajándékozza meg most külföldi és hazai partnereit ezzel a csodálatos albummal! A könyv 224 oldalas, 210 x 295mm méretű, egy köteten belül 4 nyelvű ( angol, német, olasz és magyar ), gyönyörű képekkel. Bruttó ár: 6.990,-Ft

When I saw your site I thought you might be interested in a passive residual program that doesn't require any sponsoring. You can create retirement income within 18 - 24 months, without stopping what you’re doing. It's NOT about selling products. It's NOT about recruiting your friends and family. You DON’T have to sponsor anyone.

Pasajes aereos en Business

Thanks for the replies. Jon I really hope you get together with the re- linq/re-motion guys to implement the ideas you have, it would be a shame for a project of this sort to just fade away. Will begin digging through the existing code base for dblinq and the ideas you've sketched for 0.19. Never been involved with an open-source project but

Does your world feel small? Need more people to speak with about your business? Looking for a new way to grow your business using the internet? Discover: http:/[link] How to get leads now on the internet to naturally grow your business Discover: [link] See you on the other side... Dawn

Hi all, I am attempting to generate the LINQ Classes from my DB using SqlMetal (as per [link]) When I try and run SqlMetal I get an 'abort trap' message and no output files are created. Output: I am using Macv OSX with Mono 2.1.x using the bundled DbLinq libraries

You have been anounced by the BMW Automobile Company as the Win.ner of 850,000GBP Promotion conducted by the B.M.W Automobile. For claims,reply to us with your information  via email On < [email protected] >.   Regards, Barr. Steve Moore.

And this is why the re-linq folks got in touch with me. Having a "standardized" cross-DB interface to re-linq/etc. would be wonderful. I had suggested following System.Data.Common.CommandTree s for the standardized interface (as that's what EF uses), but (sadly) we found that CommandTrees made all the constructors private/internal. :-(

Acutally I'm currently focused on the Epic.NET <[link]> project. It's a framework to build complex domain driven applications, but it has some problems in common with dblinq: we are designing a query provider and we are going to use re-linq; we need to have multidatabase support (but for

It means that I have lofty plans that may never see the light of day. :-) DbLinq could use a major refactoring (see also all the type check code riddled ~everywhere instead of using proper OO abstractions). It could use lots of help in general ... [More] , frankly (see also the unit tests taking ~10 minutes to execute, _just_ for SQL Server & SQLite). I see re-motion/re-linq as a possible solution to some of this, as they have an existing LINQ abstraction to simplify the writing of IQueryable providers (which can also be used to simplify unit tests -- yay!). What's lacking is a "proper" cross-DB abstraction layer, which is where DbLinq could come in (as DbLinq already supports multiple DBs -- somewhat -- so this would be a good exercise for testing a new cross-DB abstraction). [Less]