manent

I Use This!

Inactive

Analyzed 1 day ago. based on code collected 1 day ago.

Project Summary

Manent is an algorithmically strong backup and archival program. It features:

Efficient backup to anything that looks like a storage. Currently it supports plain filesystem ("directory"), ftp and sftp. Planned are Amazon S3, optical disks and email (smtp + imap). Manent can work (making progress towards finishing a backup) over a slow and unreliable network. Manent can offer online access to the contents of the backup. Currentlly, local FTP serving is being worked on; in the future, FUSE support for Linux will be added. Backed up storage is completely encrypted. Backup is incremental, including changed parts of large files. Moved, renamed and duplicate files will not require additional storage. Several computers can use the same storage for backup, automatically sharing data. Both very l

In a Nutshell, manent...

...
has had 707 commits made by 5 contributors
representing 7,801 lines of code
...
is mostly written in Python
with an average number of source code comments
...
has a young, but established codebase
maintained by nobody
with stable Y-O-Y commits
...
took an estimated 2 years of effort (COCOMO model)
starting with its first commit in November, 2006
ending with its most recent commit about 15 years ago

Quick Reference

Project Links:

Homepage
Download

Code Locations:

https://github.com/gsasha/manent

Similar Projects:

Managers:

gsasha

Licenses

GNU General Public License v3.0 or later

Permitted

Commercial Use

Modify

Distribute

Place Warranty

Use Patent Claims

Forbidden

Sub-License

Hold Liable

Required

Distribute Original

Disclose Source

Include Copyright

State Changes

Include License

Include Install Instructions

These details are provided for information only. No information here is legal advice and should not be used as such.

All Licenses

Project Security

Vulnerabilities per Version ( last 10 releases )

There are no reported vulnerabilities

Project Vulnerability Report

Security Confidence Index

Poor security track-record

Favorable security track-record

Vulnerability Exposure Index

Many reported vulnerabilities

Few reported vulnerabilities

About Project Vulnerability Report

Did You Know...

...
in 2016, 47% of companies did not have formal process in place to track OS code
...
learn about Open Hub updates and features on the Open Hub blog
...
55% of companies leverage OSS for production infrastructure
...
search using multiple tags to find exactly what you need