Forums : Ohloh General Discussion
Dear Open Hub Users,
We’re excited to announce that we will be moving the Open Hub Forum to
https://community.blackduck.com/s/black-duck-open-hub.
Beginning immediately, users can head over,
register,
get technical help and discuss issue pertinent to the Open Hub. Registered users can also subscribe to Open Hub announcements here.
On May 1, 2020, we will be freezing https://www.openhub.net/forums and users will not be able to create new discussions. If you have any questions and concerns, please email us at
[email protected]
2-clause BSD license is not parsed properly
Hello,
The Herrie project is licensed under a 2-clause BSD license (the same as FreeBSD uses). For some reason, the 'Code' page shows:
Ohloh searches the source code for individual license declarations. Ohloh didn't find any such declarations in this project's source code.
Please see the following URL; it's one of the C files of the app:
Thanks for reporting this Ed,
Took me a while but have a fix - that third clause is an easy way to differentiate between files owned by The Regents of California which use the BSD license and files with a BSD derived license, like yours.
Please let me know if the new results look correct.
I didn't see a page describing this link at http://www.opensource.org/licenses. If you know of such a link, would you please edit the license page I created and/or let me know what that link is so I can edit it.
Thanks in advance,
Andy
