Forums : Posts

Yes, I've scheduled it for a retry.

Hi Richard, I've rescheduled an update. I'll keep an eye on it.

Hi Robin, thanks for your reply. I suppose that adding also develbranch_6 will take effects also to the other committers in the ohloh community, so I think that I should first ask them if they agree with the inflating issue... Best Regards, Marco

Thanks for the proposal but I think that instead of wasting your time digging for this information for me, and then for the next user, and the next; you (or someone on the develop team) should use ... [More] that time in developing the feature. I would help developing this feature but I don't have the time right now :( [Less]

Hi Steve, Nothing has gone wrong. Our system is designed to only let a particular download run for 8 hours before it is paused and put back in the queue. This prevents individual large projects from ... [More] monopolizing all of our server time. It looks like we got about halfway through the download before the timer ran out. I'd expect that the next run should complete the download. After this initial bulk download completes, we shouldn't run into this issue again -- day-to-day updates usually run very quickly. [Less]

Hi Lex, The trouble is on our end -- we've had some off-and-on database troubles that are causing us to fall behind on some projects. I've bumped the priority of this project, so you should see a ... [More] new report sometime today or tomorrow. Thanks, Robin [Less]

hi, hmm.. now it updated.. thanks, whoever made it to update ;)

Oh thanks, that explains it. :) (No need to bump it though, I just have to wait like anyone else.)

Yes, it's looking good from our end again. I've restarted the download. I'll keep this project on my watch list and make sure it goes through. Thanks, Robin

I will probably not be rewriting history for this. I expect the same thing will happen when the forked off lwp, rpc2 and rvm libraries, which are currently independent repositories, are merged back ... [More] into the main source tree which I expect to happen at some future date. There is a fundamental issue with the way additions/deletions are counted. Yes, thousands of lines of code were removed in that branch of the code. But they were indirectly re-added when the branch was merged back because the code survived in the (in this case main-line) branch. [Less]