4
I Use This!
Very Low Activity

News

Analyzed about 21 hours ago. based on code collected 1 day ago.
Posted almost 12 years ago by yallie
[en] Fixed a bug with stream handling in ChannelWrapper (issue #2174).
Posted almost 12 years ago by yallie
System.InvalidOperationException occurred: Collection was modified, enumeration can not execute.Call stack: ```mscorlib.dll!System.Collections.Generic.List<Zyan.Communication.Delegates.DelegateCorrelationInfo>.Enumerator.MoveNext() + 0x41 ... [More] bytesZyan.Communication.dll!Zyan.Communication.ZyanProxy.ReconnectRemoteEvents() Line 392Zyan.Communication.dll!Zyan.Communication.ZyanConnection.ReconnectRemoteEvents() Line 966Zyan.Communication.dll!Zyan.Communication.ZyanConnection.CheckRemoteSubscriptionCounter.AnonymousMethod__e(object x) Line 995 mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.QueueUserWorkItemCallback.WaitCallback_Context(object state)```Comments: Fixed, see changeset #38284. [Less]
Posted almost 12 years ago by yallie
[en] Protecting delegate correlation set in multi-threaded environment (issue #2175).
Posted almost 12 years ago by yallie
System.InvalidOperationException occurred: Collection was modified, enumeration can not execute.Call stack: ```mscorlib.dll!System.Collections.Generic.List<Zyan.Communication.Delegates.DelegateCorrelationInfo>.Enumerator.MoveNext() + 0x41 ... [More] bytesZyan.Communication.dll!Zyan.Communication.ZyanProxy.ReconnectRemoteEvents() Line 392Zyan.Communication.dll!Zyan.Communication.ZyanConnection.ReconnectRemoteEvents() Line 966Zyan.Communication.dll!Zyan.Communication.ZyanConnection.CheckRemoteSubscriptionCounter.AnonymousMethod__e(object x) Line 995 mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.QueueUserWorkItemCallback.WaitCallback_Context(object state)``` [Less]
Posted almost 12 years ago by yallie
System.InvalidOperationException occurred: Collection was modified, enumeration can not execute.Call stack: ```mscorlib.dll!System.Collections.Generic.List<Zyan.Communication.Delegates.DelegateCorrelationInfo>.Enumerator.MoveNext() + 0x41 ... [More] bytesZyan.Communication.dll!Zyan.Communication.ZyanProxy.ReconnectRemoteEvents() Line 392Zyan.Communication.dll!Zyan.Communication.ZyanConnection.ReconnectRemoteEvents() Line 966Zyan.Communication.dll!Zyan.Communication.ZyanConnection.CheckRemoteSubscriptionCounter.AnonymousMethod__e(object x) Line 995 mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.QueueUserWorkItemCallback.WaitCallback_Context(object state)``` [Less]
Posted almost 12 years ago by yallie
Unfortunately, I am currently very busy (the end of a year is always a hot time), so I can't promise to handle it in a few days. I don't see an easy way to fix the bug, so it might need quite a bit of time to research.
Posted almost 12 years ago by MyKey0815
yallie wrote: You can easily create a separate ZyanComponentHost for the update service and use standard TCP channel for it. It will probably need another authentication/authorization scheme anyway (for example, no authentication, so that anyone can ... [More] update the software). Your main service will still use duplex tcp, while the update service will be simplex tcp-based. OK - that is a nice workaround. Do you think, that you Need a Long time to resolve the Problem? If you can fix it in few days then I will wait on the fix. But if you think you Need much weeks or months then I will implement the Workaround [Less]
Posted almost 12 years ago by yallie
MyKey0815 wrote:   OK - I cannot use Standard TCP   Why not? You can easily create a separate ZyanComponentHost for the update service and use standard TCP channel for it. It will probably need another authentication/authorization scheme ... [More] anyway (for example, no authentication, so that anyone can update the software). Your main service will still use duplex tcp, while the update service will be simplex tcp-based. [Less]
Posted almost 12 years ago by MyKey0815
yallie wrote: Ah, I see. It must be a bug in TcpExChannel. I'll create an issue for it. I'm afraid you'll have to use standard TCP channel until the bug is fixed. Thanks for reporting! OK - I cannot use Standard TCP, but is no Problem in the ... [More] meantime. I will wait until you fix the bug. Then I can release the "Self-Updating-Application"- Feature ;-) [Less]
Posted almost 12 years ago by yallie
This discussion has been copied to a work item. Click here to go to the work item and continue the discussion.