|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Robert
Does anyone have any idea why the solutions to static magnetic problems in xfemm would appear in line with FEMM results, but harmonic solutions at any frequency give only NaN for solution components? The harmonic problems differ from the static
|
|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Robert
Is there a tool in xfemm to remove segments? I see one for removing nodes, but not segments. Based on the code for deletenode_mfemm, it looks like eliminating an entry in the Segments or ArcSegments arrays must be followed by a renumbering of
|
|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Robert
Is there a tool in xfemm to remove segments? I see one for removing nodes, but not segments. Based on the code for deletenode_mfemm, it looks like eliminating an entry in the Segments or ArcSegments arrays must be followed by a renumbering of
|
|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Robert
I wrote an elementary script in the style of other xfemm functions to solve the basic problem for which I started this thread. I've attached the code here for anyone to use. Caveat emptor: 1. I'm no software engineer, and I wrote this on a tight time
|
|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Robert
I know this is an old thread (as are most of the threads here) but I was about to post about this very same issue myself. I've noticed that there seems to be a significant difference between how FEMM and xfemm treat overlapping segments; in FEMM
|
|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Robert
There's a very useful wizard in FEMM, "Create IABC Open Boundary," which automatically constructs high-order asymptotic boundary conditions using the problem geometry and user inputs. Is this tool available somewhere in xfemm? I tried searching the
|
|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Robert
There's a very useful wizard in FEMM, "Create IABC Open Boundary," which automatically constructs high-order asymptotic boundary conditions using the problem geometry and user inputs. Is this tool available somewhere in xfemm? I tried searching the
|
|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Robert
Sounds good. Thank you for all of the work that you've put into this project!
|
|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Richard C
I was listening, if it helps, but unfortunately too busy to help at the moment, and have experience, or access to a mac. At some point I can see if I can merge your changes with the main code.
|
|
Posted
about 5 years
ago
by
Robert
Well, I got it all to compile. It was a massive pain. I modified several include directives and compilation options as described above (trivial modifications, I suspect) but also commmented out a couple of FPU-related lines (potentially more
|