| long double? |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| long double? |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| obsolete and incomplete implementation, replaced by boost |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| obsolete and incomplete implementation, replaced by boost |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| obsolete and incomplete implementation, replaced by boost |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| nice trick to write absolute path |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| nice trick to write absolute path |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| nice trick to write absolute path |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| build sample; the sample not commited yet |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| build sample; the sample not commited yet |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| build sample; the sample not commited yet |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| implementation of <system_error> revision 2 from C++ 0x draft, see http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG21/docs/papers/2007/n2303.html |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| implementation of <system_error> revision 2 from C++ 0x draft, see http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG21/docs/papers/2007/n2303.html |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| implementation of <system_error> revision 2 from C++ 0x draft, see http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG21/docs/papers/2007/n2303.html |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| what printed as address of member function? |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| what printed as address of member function? |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| what printed as address of member function? |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| how to use paramertized member function |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| how to use paramertized member function |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| how to use paramertized member function |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| index of array via reverse iterator |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| index of array via reverse iterator |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| index of array via reverse iterator |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| UDP require larger buffer, because it should take all message at once [max 65535]. |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| UDP require larger buffer, because it should take all message at once [max 65535]. |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| UDP require larger buffer, because it should take all message at once [max 65535]. |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| remove out-of-date sockmgr_sream_MP_SELECT; stack size restriction for loop really dangerous; accept_udp come back, but concept changed---no session at all in UDP processing; test for simple udp connection; libsockios: Version 1.14.0 |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| remove out-of-date sockmgr_sream_MP_SELECT; stack size restriction for loop really dangerous; accept_udp come back, but concept changed---no session at all in UDP processing; test for simple udp connection; libsockios: Version 1.14.0 |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| remove out-of-date sockmgr_sream_MP_SELECT; stack size restriction for loop really dangerous; accept_udp come back, but concept changed---no session at all in UDP processing; test for simple udp connection; libsockios: Version 1.14.0 |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|
| add macro LIBPREFIX to allow build shared object with name satisfied to plug-in |
|
More...
|
almost 19 years ago
|