Dear Open Hub Users,
We’re excited to announce that we will be moving the Open Hub Forum to
https://community.synopsys.com/s/black-duck-open-hub.
Beginning immediately, users can head over,
register,
get technical help and discuss issue pertinent to the Open Hub. Registered users can also subscribe to Open Hub announcements here.
On May 1, 2020, we will be freezing https://www.openhub.net/forums and users will not be able to create new discussions. If you have any questions and concerns, please email us at
[email protected]
Thanks for the response. I have asked before and been directed there before (this was some time ago prior to the Black Duck acquisition) but the issue is I am not a Ruby programmer so I can't really
I'm guessing that managers are implicitly contributors. For example I am listed as a manager for Vexi: https://www.ohloh.net/p/vexi/ I do not appear in the contributor list on that page, but if you
Wow, impressive way to discredit a post on an entirely valid point by putting 3 pointless additional words. You could have been more efficient and just used one. Asshole.
I look forward to future announcements relating to this issue. Thanks! =)
We use preprocessed Java - that is, Java that contains macros to be processed. Currently ohcount (like sloccount) ignores these .jpp files. The .jpp files contain our most significant code.
There are numerous projects now using Vexi. Vexi files are XML/JS. Currently ohcount detects them as Perl files. It is easy to know if it is a Vexi file: All Vexi templates end in .t All are JS
You're welcome. I love Ohloh and the reason I reported this was to try and help you improve it. :-)
Ok, I tried using file on one of our .t files (XML/JS, but obviously not included in your file extension list) and get the following: org.vexi.widgets/src/vexi/widget$ file button.t button.t:
Well deleting an adding the enlistment again seemed to solve things: http://www.ohloh.net/projects/3923/enlistments